On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 01:38:42PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > The Devicetree bindings document does not have to say in the title that > it is a "binding", but instead just describe the hardware. For shared > (re-usable) schemas, name them all as "common properties". > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml > index 1ab416c83c8d..d2de3d128b73 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/clock/qcom,gcc.yaml# > $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > -title: Qualcomm Global Clock & Reset Controller Common Bindings > +title: Qualcomm Global Clock & Reset Controller common parts > > maintainers: > - Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml > index cf9c2f7bddc2..20ac432dc683 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml > @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ > $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/opp/opp-v2-base.yaml# > $schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > -title: Generic OPP (Operating Performance Points) Common Binding > +title: Generic OPP (Operating Performance Points) common parts > > maintainers: > - Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> Hey Krzysztof, Hopefully I've not overlooked something obvious, but it wasnt noted in the commit message - how come these two are "parts" rather than "properties"? The opp one at least don't seem to have much more than properties and patterProperties in it. Thanks, Conor.
