On 22-06-30 20:03:07, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 30/06/2022 14:13, Viorel Suman (OSS) wrote: > > On 22-06-29 19:51:06, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> On 29/06/2022 18:44, Viorel Suman (OSS) wrote: > >>> From: Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@xxxxxxx> > >>> > >>> Changes since v5: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220616164303.790379-1-viorel.suman@xxxxxxx/ > >>> * Updated according to Krzysztof Kozlowski comments > >>> > >> > >> My comment a about removal of each part of TXT bindings in each patch, > >> was not addressed. Your approach makes it more difficult to read patches > >> and makes sense only if each subsystem maintainer will take the patches > >> (separately). If the patches are going through one tree, then better to > >> remove the TXT gradually. > >> > >> So the question - who is going to take each of the patches? > > > > Hi Krzysztof, > > > > I just understood the context of your comment, will do it in the next version. > > > > Assuming TXT is removed from aggregating TXT - fsl,scu.txt - gradually, do you expect the > > removed to be added into the aggregating YAML - fsl,scu.yaml - also gradually within the > > same patch ? > > Each patch making the conversion should remove the piece being > converted. Then finally the patch adding fsl,scu.yaml should remove the > last pieces (remaining ones). Thank you for clarification, will follow this approach in the next version. Regards, Viorel
