On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 19:42:49 +0200, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 12/06/2022 21:23:47+0200, Stephen Kitt wrote:
> > Do you have an example of a change requiring id to support RTCs on x86
> > systems?
>
> I checked and your patch is actually fine, the issue I referred to is:
>
> 1c1b3098ae1e ("rtc: pcf85063: add i2c_device_id name matching support")
Ah yes, I see! The changes I’m making are compatible with that (as you
figured out), I’m not removing the id tables, just avoiding calls to
i2c_match_id when they’re not needed. In fact the approach I use for drivers
which do need their id tables is the same as in the commit above, with an
explicit call to i2c_match_id instead of the old-style probe.
Regards,
Stephen
Attachment:
pgprIFs5sKVL1.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
