On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:10:55 PDT (-0700), mail@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 22/04/2022 22:00, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Conor Dooley (2022-04-22 12:59:09)
On 22/04/2022 20:39, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
Thanks. These generally look good to me, but I don't see acks from everyone. I'm perfectly fine treating these as fixes and taking them through the RISC-V tree, but looks like it's mostly clk stuff so
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Ye, hopefully they go via clk. Stephen replied to v1 or 2 so
I figure they're in his queue :)
It helps to be explicit in the cover letter. It's in my queue but I put
it on hold because the cover letter didn't clarify what tree it was
intended for nor the priority of what is being fixed.
Ah right, my bad. The coordinating things between trees stuff is
still pretty new to me. If you could take the lot via clk, that'd
be great?
No problem, the multi-tree stuff is always tricky. It ended up in my
queue too, but I fast-forward to the latest version of each set as I
stumble into earlier ones so I guess I got here quickly.
Having these go through clk is better for me, I'll ignore them.
Thanks!
Is boot broken? Do I need to send these up to Linus next week as part of
fixes for this merge window?
Boot is not broken, I was hoping this would go into 5.18 to avoid
having to deal with two different sorts of reference clock DT
entries - 5.18 where the DT provides the mss pll & 5.18+n where
the DT provides the input to the mss pll.
So, not next week urgent, but as fixes for this window please.
Thanks,
Conor.
