Quoting Conor Dooley (2022-04-22 12:59:09) > On 22/04/2022 20:39, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > > > Thanks. These generally look good to me, but I don't see acks from everyone. I'm perfectly fine treating these as fixes and taking them through the RISC-V tree, but looks like it's mostly clk stuff so > > > > Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Ye, hopefully they go via clk. Stephen replied to v1 or 2 so > I figure they're in his queue :) It helps to be explicit in the cover letter. It's in my queue but I put it on hold because the cover letter didn't clarify what tree it was intended for nor the priority of what is being fixed. Is boot broken? Do I need to send these up to Linus next week as part of fixes for this merge window?
