On 29/03/2022 20:36:46+0000, Limonciello, Mario wrote: > HI Alexandre, > > I checked and didn't see this come into master as most of the 5.18 trees came in. > Did this get forgotten? > Not really, this was in my back log and actually the first one I wanted to apply right now. > Thanks, > > > > > > Also if it wasn't made clear in my commit message or by analyzing this code > > > change, I do believe that at least part of the reason for the previous > > > regression was because of mucking with reserved bits. This patch is much > > > more conservative. > > > > > > In my testing I found similar behaviors from the old regression on a more > > > modern platform when those bits were being touched. > > > > > > Mikhail, > > > > > > As you flagged the previous regression, would appreciate if you're able to > > > test the new patch (although of course many things in your situation have > > > changed now). > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > -- > > Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin > > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fboot > > lin.com%2F&data=04%7C01%7Cmario.limonciello%40amd.com%7C3357 > > df64bb864b6ef63e08d9dc468eae%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d% > > 7C0%7C0%7C637783018746468575%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoi > > MC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C300 > > 0&sdata=gvm24hJhVEsXrRQT6c1GtkMhi3q77Df1Biowb6gVdS8%3D&am > > p;reserved=0 -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com