Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] pwrap: mediatek: fix wait time out issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 29/03/2022 13:58, Zhiyong Tao wrote:
From: "Zhiyong.Tao" <zhiyong.tao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

add sleep delay before read "jiffies"

Signed-off-by: Zhiyong.Tao <zhiyong.tao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c | 8 ++++++--
  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
  mode change 100644 => 100755 drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c

diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
old mode 100644
new mode 100755
index 952bc554f443..ac7139a67e87
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-pmic-wrap.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
  #include <linux/regmap.h>
  #include <linux/reset.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
#define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_IORD_ARB_EN 0x4
  #define PWRAP_MT8135_BRIDGE_WACS3_EN		0x10
@@ -1197,10 +1198,13 @@ static int pwrap_wait_for_state(struct pmic_wrapper *wrp,
  	timeout = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(10000);
do {
-		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
-			return fp(wrp) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
  		if (fp(wrp))
  			return 0;
+
+		usleep_range(10, 11);
+

You need to explain this change. Why is it needed, are you sure it does not break other platforms etc.

I can guess why you need that patch here. In any case in the code you provide, it would make sense to move the first if out of the do loop and only after this wait 10 us before reading again. Right now the code does usleep only after every other read.

Regards,
Matthias

+		if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
+			return fp(wrp) ? 0 : -ETIMEDOUT;
  	} while (1);
  }



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux