On 21-12-29 22:36:27, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > On 21/12/2021 14:15:46+0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > Add i.MX8QM rtc compatible to the SCU bindings documentation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt | 4 +++- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt > > index f1470d562156..4633be2182dd 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt > > @@ -134,7 +134,9 @@ RTC bindings based on SCU Message Protocol > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Required properties: > > -- compatible: should be "fsl,imx8qxp-sc-rtc"; > > +- compatible: Should be one of: > > + "fsl,imx8qm-sc-rtc", > > + "fsl,imx8qxp-sc-rtc". > > Are the imx8qm and imx8qxp SCU actually different? I would hope you > won't had a third messaging protocol for the RTC... > Sorry, my bad. No, there is no difference between imx8mq and imx8qxp. I'll replace the compatible in the imx8qm.dtsi with fsl,imx8qxp-sc-rtc, drop this patch and the one that adds the compatible to the rtc driver. > > -- > Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com/
