On 23 November 2021 14:06, Nikita Shubin wrote: > As da9063 driver refuses to load without irq, we simply add it as a wakeup > source before registering rtc device. Can you please make the commit message more detailed, explaining why you're making this change; what it adds/fixes/removes/etc.? Right now just reading this I'm unclear as to why you're adding a call to device_init_wakeup() here. The generic I2C client code will mark the parent MFD device as a wake source, if the relevant boolean 'wakeup' is defined in DT, so what does this add? > > Signed-off-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > v1->v2: > Alexandre Belloni: > > Dropped everything except device_init_wakeup, as driver refuses to load > without irq specified, we can always set it as a wakeup source, before > calling devm_rtc_register_device. > --- > drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c > index d4b72a9fa2ba..b9a73356bace 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c > @@ -494,6 +494,8 @@ static int da9063_rtc_probe(struct platform_device > *pdev) > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to request ALARM IRQ %d: %d\n", > irq_alarm, ret); > > + device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, true); > + > return devm_rtc_register_device(rtc->rtc_dev); > } > > -- > 2.31.1