Alexandre Belloni wrote on Mon, Nov 08, 2021 at 09:42:53AM +0100: > On 08/11/2021 12:16:59+0900, Dominique Martinet wrote: > > Hi Alexandre, Alessandro, > > > > the other patch was proved to be unneeded, but this one is still a valid > > fix as far as I can understand the code (reusing RV8803_CTRL value to > > write into RV8803_FLAG does not look correct) > > > > (I'm also convinced either mostly work because the original values are > > usually close enough, but that's not a reason to keep using the wrong > > one) > > > > > > Would you have time to take a look? > > I did check with the initial review and I'm going to apply it, I just > didn't have the time to do that yet. Sorry, it wasn't clear to me whether this was dropped with the other or not. There's no hurry on my end, please apply when you can! Thanks, -- Dominique
