于 2021年7月29日 GMT+08:00 下午6:32:28, Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> 写到: >On Thu, Jul 29, 2021 at 04:04:10PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: >> 在 2021-06-16星期三的 11:14 +0200,Maxime Ripard写道: >> > Hi, >> > >> > On Tue, Jun 15, 2021 at 12:06:23PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote: >> > > Some newer Allwinner RTCs (for instance the one in the H616 SoC) >> > > lack >> > > a pin for an external 32768 Hz oscillator. As a consequence, this >> > > LOSC >> > > can't be selected as the RTC clock source, and we must rely on the >> > > internal RC oscillator. >> > > To allow additions of clocks to the RTC node, add a feature bit to >> > > ignore >> > > any provided clocks for now (the current code would think this is >> > > the >> > > external LOSC). Later DTs and code can then for instance add the >> > > PLL >> > > based clock input, and older kernel won't get confused. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx> >> > >> > Honestly, I don't really know if it's worth it at this point. >> > >> > If we sums this up: >> > >> > - The RTC has 2 features that we use, mostly centered around 2 >> > registers set plus a global one >> > >> > - Those 2 features are programmed in a completely different way >> > >> > - Even the common part is different, given the discussion around the >> > clocks that we have. >> > >> > What is there to share in that driver aside from the probe, and maybe >> > the interrupt handling? Instead of complicating this further with >> > more >> > special case that you were (rightfully) complaining about, shouldn't >> > we >> > just acknowledge the fact that it's a completely separate design and >> > should be treated as such, with a completely separate driver? >> >> I think our problem is just that we're having a single driver for both >> functionalities (clock manager and RTC). >> >> Personally I don't think we should have seperated driver for clock >> managers, although I am fine with seperated RTC driver for linear days. > >Why do you think it's a bad idea to have the RTC and clocks in the same >driver? Well you really misread, I'm just thinking we shouldn't have a new driver from scratch. As we're going to have a single sun6i-rtc, please allow H616 and R329 to enter it. > >Maxime