On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 at 3:33 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The idea is that you will send a PR to CCF maintainers instead of > > patches, although it's expected that patches appear in the mailing > > list beforehand anyway. > > Depends a little. For me, a Rev-by from the driver maintainer is enough, > and I'll pick them. That lowers the burden on the drivers maintainer > side. May not work for high volumes of patches, but for I2C this works > enough. AFAICT in practice it's a mandatory requirement in I²C subsys (in the past you hadn't accepted a patch from us without a tag from the maintainer) which makes it equal to sending PR by a maintainer. PR makes less burden since subsys maintainer don't need to run many tools or a tool many times to get the pile of patches. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
