Hello, On 05/03/2021 18:44:11+0100, Łukasz Stelmach wrote: > For an RTC without an IRQ assigned rtc_update_irq_enable() should > return -EINVAL. It will, when uie_unsupported is set. > I'm surprised this is an issue because the current code seems to cover all cases: - no irq and not wakeup-source => set_alarm should fail - no irq and wakeup-source => uie_unsupported is set - irq => UIE should work Can you elaborate on your failing use case? > Signed-off-by: Łukasz Stelmach <l.stelmach@xxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c | 14 +++++++------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c > index cd8e438bc9c4..b08a9736fa77 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1307.c > @@ -1973,13 +1973,6 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > if (IS_ERR(ds1307->rtc)) > return PTR_ERR(ds1307->rtc); > > - if (ds1307_can_wakeup_device && !want_irq) { > - dev_info(ds1307->dev, > - "'wakeup-source' is set, request for an IRQ is disabled!\n"); > - /* We cannot support UIE mode if we do not have an IRQ line */ > - ds1307->rtc->uie_unsupported = 1; > - } > - > if (want_irq) { > err = devm_request_threaded_irq(ds1307->dev, client->irq, NULL, > chip->irq_handler ?: ds1307_irq, > @@ -1993,6 +1986,13 @@ static int ds1307_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > } else { > dev_dbg(ds1307->dev, "got IRQ %d\n", client->irq); > } > + } else { > + if (ds1307_can_wakeup_device) > + dev_info(ds1307->dev, > + "'wakeup-source' is set, request for an IRQ is disabled!\n"); > + Honestly, just drop this message, it should have been removed by 82e2d43f6315 > + /* We cannot support UIE mode if we do not have an IRQ line */ > + ds1307->rtc->uie_unsupported = 1; > } > > ds1307->rtc->ops = chip->rtc_ops ?: &ds13xx_rtc_ops; > -- > 2.26.2 > -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com