Hi Alexandre, El mar, 12 ene 2021 a las 23:44, Alexandre Belloni (<alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>) escribió: > > On 23/11/2020 11:38:48+0100, Daniel González Cabanelas wrote: > > Currently there is no use for the interrupts on the rs5c372 RTC and the > > wakealarm isn't enabled. There are some devices like NAS which use this > > RTC to wake up from the power off state when the INTR pin is activated by > > the alarm clock. > > > > Enable the alarm and let to be used as a wakeup source. Tested on a Buffalo > > LS421DE NAS. > > > > Signed-off-by: Daniel González Cabanelas <dgcbueu@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/rtc/rtc-rs5c372.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rs5c372.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rs5c372.c > > index 94b778c6e..76775d66e 100644 > > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rs5c372.c > > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rs5c372.c > > @@ -654,6 +654,7 @@ static int rs5c372_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > > int err = 0; > > int smbus_mode = 0; > > struct rs5c372 *rs5c372; > > + bool rs5c372_can_wakeup_device = false; > > > > dev_dbg(&client->dev, "%s\n", __func__); > > > > @@ -689,6 +690,12 @@ static int rs5c372_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > > else > > rs5c372->type = id->driver_data; > > > > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > > I don't think you need to protect this section > > > + if(of_property_read_bool(client->dev.of_node, > > but you'll have to check client->dev.of_node is not null. > > > + "wakeup-source")) > > + rs5c372_can_wakeup_device = true; > > +#endif > > + > > /* we read registers 0x0f then 0x00-0x0f; skip the first one */ > > rs5c372->regs = &rs5c372->buf[1]; > > rs5c372->smbus = smbus_mode; > > @@ -722,6 +729,8 @@ static int rs5c372_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > > goto exit; > > } > > > > + rs5c372->has_irq = 1; > > + > This is an unrelated change but is this actually useful? I guess you > should simply remove has_irq. > > > /* if the oscillator lost power and no other software (like > > * the bootloader) set it up, do it here. > > * > > @@ -748,6 +757,10 @@ static int rs5c372_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > > ); > > > > /* REVISIT use client->irq to register alarm irq ... */ > > + if (rs5c372_can_wakeup_device) { > > + device_init_wakeup(&client->dev, true); > > + } > > + > > rs5c372->rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&client->dev, > > rs5c372_driver.driver.name, > > &rs5c372_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE); > > @@ -761,6 +774,9 @@ static int rs5c372_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > > if (err) > > goto exit; > > > > + /* the rs5c372 alarm only supports a minute accuracy */ > > + rs5c372->rtc->uie_unsupported = 1; > > + > > Honestly, the whole driver would need some modernization so if you have > time to test, I can propose a set of patches. > Of course I can test them. I'll reply with ACK once tested. Regards Daniel > > -- > Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin > Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering > https://bootlin.com