Hi, On 13/08/2020 15:41:34+1000, Victor Ding wrote: > cmos_read_alarm() may leave certain fields of a struct rtc_time > untouched; therefore, these fields contain garbage if not properly > initialized, leading to inconsistent values when converting into > time64_t. > This patch to set all fields of a struct rtc_time to -1 before calling > cmos_read_alarm(). > I don't think this actually helps with the conversion as mktime64 is taking unsigned int so I would think you need the whole logic that is in __rtc_read_alarm > Signed-off-by: Victor Ding <victording@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c > index bcc96ab7793f..c99af567780d 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c > @@ -1006,6 +1006,7 @@ static int cmos_suspend(struct device *dev) > enable_irq_wake(cmos->irq); > } > > + memset(&cmos->saved_wkalrm.time, -1, sizeof(struct rtc_time)); > cmos_read_alarm(dev, &cmos->saved_wkalrm); > > dev_dbg(dev, "suspend%s, ctrl %02x\n", > @@ -1054,6 +1055,7 @@ static void cmos_check_wkalrm(struct device *dev) > return; > } > > + memset(¤t_alarm.time, -1, sizeof(struct rtc_time)); > cmos_read_alarm(dev, ¤t_alarm); > t_current_expires = rtc_tm_to_time64(¤t_alarm.time); > t_saved_expires = rtc_tm_to_time64(&cmos->saved_wkalrm.time); > -- > 2.28.0.236.gb10cc79966-goog > -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com