On 06 March 2020 07:36, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> This allows further improvement of the driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-da9052.c | 8 ++++----
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9052.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9052.c
> index 204eb7cf1aa4..e159c5911122 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9052.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9052.c
> @@ -298,12 +298,12 @@ static int da9052_rtc_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> rtc_err(rtc, "Failed to disable TICKS: %d\n", ret);
>
> device_init_wakeup(&pdev->dev, true);
> - rtc->rtc = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, pdev->name,
> - &da9052_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE);
> -
> + rtc->rtc = devm_rtc_allocate_device(&pdev->dev);
> if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtc))
> return PTR_ERR(rtc->rtc);
>
> + rtc->rtc->ops = &da9052_rtc_ops;
> +
> ret = da9052_request_irq(rtc->da9052, DA9052_IRQ_ALARM, "ALM",
> da9052_rtc_irq, rtc);
> if (ret != 0) {
> @@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ static int da9052_rtc_probe(struct platform_device
> *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> - return 0;
> + return rtc_register_device(rtc->rtc);
It seems with this change there's no tidy up around the IRQ.
da9052_request_irq() isn't calling a devm_* function so I'm not sure how the
IRQ is being freed on failure. In actual fact it looks like there's no _remove()
function for this driver which, although that's a separate topic.
> }
>
> static struct platform_driver da9052_rtc_driver = {
> --
> 2.24.1
