> > On 8/27/19 7:37 AM, Biwen Li wrote: > > - In drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf85363.c, CTRL_STOP_EN is 0x2e, but DT_100THS > > is 0, max_regiter is 0x2f, then reg will be equal to 0x30, > > '0x30 < 0x2f' is false,so regmap_writeable will return false. > > > > - The pcf85363/pcf85263 has the capability of address wrapping > > which means if you access a continuous address range across a > > certain boundary(max_register of struct regmap_config) the > > hardware actually wraps the access to a lower address. But the > > address violation check of regmap rejects such access. > > nitpick: This 2 paragraphs could be combined to clear up the issue: > > ` > The pcf85363/pcf85263 has the capability of address wrapping which means if > you access an address outside the allowed range > (0x00-0x2f) the hardware actually wraps the access to a lower address. > The rtc-pf85363 driver will use this feature to configure the time and execute 2 > actions in the same i2c write operation (stopping the clock and configure the > time). However the driver has also configured the `regmap maxregister` > protection mechanism that will block accessing addresses outside valid range > (0x00-0x2f). > ` > > nitpick: I would also use separate buffers for this actions. Up to you :) > > Otherwise LGTM +1 Thanks, it's a beautiful explanation. > > Nandor