On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:53 PM Vaittinen, Matti
<Matti.Vaittinen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2019-08-08 at 10:29 +0800, Yuehaibing wrote:
> > On 2019/7/9 13:25, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > > awkward at first sight but indeed - depends on BD70528_WATCHDOG
> > > disallows BD70528_WATCHDOG=m with RTC_DRV_BD70528=y while
> > > !BD70528_WATCHDOG allows BD70528_WATCHDOG=n. Brilliant and exactly
> > > what
> > > we need :) Thanks a bunch!
> >
> > Hello Vaittinen,
> >
> > the issue still exists in linux-next 20190807, any plan?
> >
>
> Sorry folks. I thought Arnd would send new patch - I didn't want to
> steal his work ;) I will be back to my normal life next week so I
> will send a patch at monday if the issue is still open!
Sorry I lost track, and thanks for the offer to take care of it.
Please add my one
Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
and/or
Suggested-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
as appropriate when you create that patch.
Arnd
