On Sun, Apr 7, 2019 at 3:18 PM Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > This document also states "The naming scheme above leaves scope > > > > for further attributes should they be needed". It does not permit, > > > > however, to redefine one of the fields to mean "location", much less > > > > the declaration that a devicename of "platform" shall refer to an > > > > "internal" backlight, or that there shall be no more than one > > > > "internal" backlight in a given system. > > > > > > "platform" is as good devicename as "wilco" or "chromeos". > > > > No, because "platform" is not a device, it is something that you are > > trying to assign a magic meaning to. > > "chromeos" is not a device, either. I agree, it is not a device name. We do not assign any specific meaning to it though. We could change it to "cros_ec" if so desired and nothing should break. Thanks. -- Dmitry
