On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 18:08 +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Use SPDX-License-Identifier instead of a verbose license text.
>
> The original text refers to version 2 so also update MODULE_LICENSE() to
> "GPL v2" instead of "GPL".
This is not necessary as GPL is the same as GPL v2
commit bf7fbeeae6db644ef5995085de2bc5c6121f8c8d
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Feb 8 17:02:56 2019 +0100
module: Cure the MODULE_LICENSE "GPL" vs. "GPL v2" bogosity
and documentation/process/license-rules.rst:
The valid license strings for MODULE_LICENSE() are:
============================= =============================================
"GPL" Module is licensed under GPL version 2. This
does not express any distinction between
GPL-2.0-only or GPL-2.0-or-later. The exact
license information can only be determined
via the license information in the
corresponding source files.
"GPL v2" Same as "GPL". It exists for historic
reasons.
