On 04/12/2018 23:23:10+0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > At some point I have noticed too many users of struct rtc_time that > printing its content field by field. > > In this series I introduce %ptR[dt][r] specifier to make life a bit > easier. > > There are still users of detailed output of the struct rtc_time, but we > can introduce an additional extension for them in the future if needed, > otherwise they might be converted to the proposed output format. > > Some of the changes slightly modify the output. In those cases we are on > the safe side since they are pure debug. Nevertheless I tried to leave > numbers to be the same or quite close: in some cases year was printed > +1900, though month was left in the range [0,11] instead of [1,12]. > > I didn't compile everything there, though I did a basic smoke test on > some x86 hardware. So, I rely on kbuild test robot as well :-) > > Most of the users currently are RTC drivers, thus the patch series is > assumed to go via RTC tree. > > Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> > > Changelog v6: > - add few test cases (Petr) > - timeanddate -> time_and_date (Petr) > - drop while loop for finding raw parameter (Petr) > - drop first patch as seems to go via nvmem tree, though I didn't see it there > > Changelog v5: - remove leftover from pointer() comment in vsprintf.c > - fix indentation in rtc-proc.c > - fix patch 1 as suggested by Joe and Alexandre > - add Thierry's Ab tag > - update Alexandre's email and Cc to Petr > > Changelog v4: > - drop mention of PRINTK_PEXT_TIMEDATE (Joe) > - drop deprecated validation (Alexandre) > - add patch 1 to fix compilation warning (may be applied independently) > > Changelog v3: > - no one supported configuration option for new extension, so it's dropped > - amend documentation (Geert) > - optimize flags checking (Geert) > - drop patch against non-existing anymore drivers > (due to massive architectures removal) > - rebase on top of recent linux-next > > Changelog v2: > - split out lib/vsprintf changes to separate series > - build it optionally depending on introduced PRINTK_PEXT_TIMEDATE > - for now support only struct rtc_time > - make an additional letter for different time representations > - make above letter capital to reduce confusion on %ptr vs. %ptR > - drop kdb patch since it's a candidate for time64_t support > > Andy Shevchenko (20): > lib/vsprintf: Print time and date in human readable format via %pt > rtc: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: at91rm9200: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: at91sam9: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: m41t80: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: m48t59: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: mcp795: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: pcf50633: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: pic32: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: pm8xxx: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: puv3: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: rk808: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: rx6110: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: rx8025: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: s3c: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: s5m: Switch to use %ptR > rtc: tegra: Switch to use %ptR > Input: hp_sdc_rtc - Switch to use %ptR > m68k/mac: Switch to use %ptR > PM: Switch to use %ptR > All applied, thanks. -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
