Hi, On 13/08/2018 19:31:24+0800, zhong jiang wrote: > PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO has implemented the if(IS_ERR(...)) + PTR_ERR, So > just replace them rather than duplicating its implement. > > Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c > index b253bf1..fd6850c 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-digicolor.c > @@ -202,10 +202,8 @@ static int __init dc_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, rtc); > rtc->rtc_dev = devm_rtc_device_register(&pdev->dev, pdev->name, > &dc_rtc_ops, THIS_MODULE); > - if (IS_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev)) > - return PTR_ERR(rtc->rtc_dev); > > - return 0; > + return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(rtc->rtc_dev); As many other maintainers, I don't find that kind of change useful and I'm not taking them unless there are other improvements in the driver. -- Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
