[PATCH 004/100] rtc: rs5c348: let the core handle invalid time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Returning a valid time when the time is invalid is a bad practice, because
then userspace is not able to react on the information. Also, it doesn't
make sense to return epoch because it is already the default time.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-rs5c348.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rs5c348.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rs5c348.c
index 9a306983aaba..f2de8b17e7e3 100644
--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-rs5c348.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-rs5c348.c
@@ -135,11 +135,6 @@ rs5c348_rtc_read_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm)
 	tm->tm_year = bcd2bin(rxbuf[RS5C348_REG_YEAR]) +
 		((rxbuf[RS5C348_REG_MONTH] & RS5C348_BIT_Y2K) ? 100 : 0);
 
-	if (rtc_valid_tm(tm) < 0) {
-		dev_err(&spi->dev, "retrieved date/time is not valid.\n");
-		rtc_time_to_tm(0, tm);
-	}
-
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.16.1




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux