> >> +static inline int rtd119x_rtc_year_days(int year)
> >> +{
> >> + return rtc_year_days(1, 12, year);
> >
> > I'm not sure it is worth wrapping rtc_year_days
> [snip]
>
> Well, I found your rtc_year_days rather confusing and had to play with
> the arguments until I got it working as expected, so I wanted an inline
> function (or macro) as abstraction from my three callers.
I agree with that. I was wondering why 1st December was being used. I
would say this API does not do too well on Rusty's API Design
Manifesto.
It does at least get the day/month/year in the right order ;-)
Andrew
