Re: Lazy preemption on arm64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2024-12-17 12:23:18 [+0000], Mark Rutland wrote:
> Yep, I had that in my HACK patch:
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rt-users/20241217115931.wjw_HO2V@xxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#m12eece66786a3a207e4e952bdf58570ab75c6a89
> 
> ... so it sounds like we're on the same page. :)

That is great then. I somehow accounted this for the KVM bits but you
have KVM_XFER_TO_GUEST_WORK so it is all good.

> > I would appreciate it. However if there is reason to delay it I could
> > hold to it for some time…
> 
> I'll try to spin it as a proper patch later this week (and will Cc the
> folk here, along with Jinjie, etc); it'll be up to Will and Catalin as
> to whether they're happy to pick it up, but given it's small I suspect
> that'll be fine.
Okay.

> Mark.

Sebastian





[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux