Re: Futex hash_bucket lock can break isolation and cause priority inversion on RT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 03:44:23PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> 
> On 10/8/24 1:38 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 04:22:26PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > > Does this report make any sense? If it does, has this issue ever been
> > > reported and possibly discussed? I guess it’s kind of a corner case, but
> > > I wonder if anybody has suggestions already on how to possibly try to
> > > tackle it from a kernel perspective.
> > Any shared lock can cause such havoc. Futex hash buckets is just one of
> > a number of very popular ones that's relatively easy to hit.
> > 
> > I do have some futex-numa patches still pending, but they won't
> > magically sure this either. Userspace needs help at the very least.
> 
> Regarding the futex-numa patches, are you planning to get them merged soon?
> We have customers asking for that.

They're on the todo list somewhere... I know Ampere had interest, other
than that nobody really said anything.




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux