Re: test 1: was: Re: A Comparison of printk between upstream and linux-rt-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 07:02:49PM +0206, John Ogness wrote:
> For the 8250, I would expect the legacy driver (even during "hope and
> pray" mode) to be fairly reliable.
> 
> If this is running in QEMU, you could attach gdb and dump the backtrace
> for the panic CPU and investigate some state variables. If this is
> reproducible, it may be worth investigating where/why the legacy
> printing is choking.
> 
> John Ogness

Hi John.

This is not running in QEMU. I installed & booted this kernel directly.
Considering that this produced a vmcore, I could try my hand at doing a crash
analysis (with some pointers).

Do you think running this kernel in QEMU would behave any differently than it is
now?

Best,





[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux