Question Regarding isolcpus
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Question Regarding isolcpus
- From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2023 12:45:14 -0400
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Hi All,
I have a question regarding the isolcpus parameter. I've been seeing
this parameter commonly used. However, in the kernel.org
documentation[0], isolcpus is listed as depreciated.
Is it the case that isolcpus should not be used at all? I've seen it
used in conjunction with taskset. However, should we now be telling rt
users to use only cpusets in cgroups? I see that CPUAffinity can be set
in /etc/systemd/system.conf. Is that the preferred method, so the
process scheduler will automatically migrate processes between the
cpusets in the cgroup cpuset or the list set by CPUAffinity?
I'm sure there are some presentations or papers on this, so I'll dig
around as well :-)
Thanks,
Joe
[0]
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.15/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.html#:~:text=Deprecated%20%2D%20use%20cpusets%20instead
[Index of Archives]
[RT Stable]
[Kernel Newbies]
[IDE]
[Security]
[Git]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Yosemite]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Linux ATA RAID]
[Samba]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Device Mapper]