On 2023-08-09 10:50:59 [-0300], Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote: > On Wed, Aug 09, 2023 at 10:17:38AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > Looks good, just a nitpick: If you add 2/3 you don't need 1/3. > > Agreed. I just kept 1/3 because I wanted to both give credit to André Pribil > for reporting the problem and also highlight the symptom he observed. > Should I add that as a note on 2/3 and drop the first patch? Sure. Instead of fixing that one incident (and there were of few of those as far as I remember) it is more future proof to do what Steven suggested. > Thanks for reviewing the RC! > Luis Sebastian
