Re: POSIX timer wakeups not preempting RT threads

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2023-06-27 18:22:51 [+0000], Clark Williams wrote:
> Martin,
Hi,

> Building on what Sebastian said, I'd say you have two options for this. The
> first, if you absolutely must use POSIX timers, is to bump the ktimer/*
> threads to a SCHED_FIFO priority at least one above your application. That

Be ware that this thread also handles all _other_ wakeup on the given
CPU.
…
> Ever since we've been using the PREEMPT_RT series, most people avoid using
> signals for regular event delivery. It's not that the signal mechanism is
> wrong, it's just that it's complicated code, having to handle a lot of
> legacy signal handling behavior that an RTOS probably doesn't care about. I
> suspect that after PREEMPT_RT merges, we'll need to do a thorough audit, to
> make sure we don't have any corner cases for unreasonable delays in signal
> delivery, but to this point it hasn't really been a priority.

Other than the locks, you have a memory allocation in the sender's path.

> If it were me I'd do it in a dedicated thread.

Either that or rework the logic so that the proper thread gets the
wakeup.

> Clark

Sebastian




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux