On Fri, 19 May 2023 at 16:57, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Ard, > > On 2023-05-18 00:05:33 [+0200], Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > Don't let me stop you :-) > > made a small series. It seems to address everything and with your > assembly rework it is not a big mess. > > What do you think? > This looks reasonable to me - thanks for taking the time. However, I was about to hit send on my PR to Russell for the following series: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ardb/linux.git/log/?h=arm-vfp-softirq-fixes which moves all of the VFP processing to C, and so this is going to conflict at the very least, but also provide a cleaner base for patch #2 in this series. Also, aren't there a few other places in the VFP code where BH are disabled and enabled again? Do those need the same treatment? Thanks, Ard.
