On 2023-01-16 13:58:42 [-0500], John Kacur wrote: > > Okay, not sure how that adds to the conversation. I'm all for "sane" > defaults for --smp too, but we care about other kinds of invocations too. > As soon as I get a patch that doesn't break other things as well, I'll > apply it. BROKEN IT IS. I want to use that and not fix every time I use it. Using -S -p 90 -d0 -m are already a lot of options just for a simple test to use all CPUs on a system. This used to work on this machine. Now it starts way more threads than I have CPUs. I accept that this might be something that someone wants to test so he can use -t 100. But the simple test that is no longer working. srsly. Starting more threads than the current available online CPUs or even CPU affinity makes no sense since the results with equal priority distribution or not reproducible. > John Sebastian
