Re: SCHED_OTHER > SCHED_FIFO?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/13/22 00:07, Christophe Blaess wrote:
Hi

On 13/10/2022 01:25, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
Thanks for the suggestion, but it gives results that are only slightly better:


It will probably make no difference as you run your task on an isolcpu but did you set  `sysctl  kernel.sched_rt_runtime_us=-1`

Wow, this plus Clark's suggestion to run with SCHED_FIFO priority 2 fixed it, thank you!!

With those two changes I now get identical, awesome results with SCHED_OTHER:0 and SCHED_FIFO:2 (running on an isolcpu):

$ sudo sysctl kernel.sched_rt_runtime_us=-1
kernel.sched_rt_runtime_us = -1
$ sudo ./busy using PTHREAD_EXPLICT_SCHED to set SCHED_FIFO (with highest priority)
scheduling policy: SCHED_FIFO
scheduling parameter priority: 2 (min=1, max=99)
cpu affinity: 3
after 10000 iterations:
    min=54001 cycles (1000.019 us, 1.000 ms)
    avg=54002.001 cycles (1000.037 us, 1.000 ms)
    max=54004 cycles (1000.074 us, 1.000 ms)
OK: worst latency < 2 ms

using PTHREAD_INHERIT_SCHED to keep SCHED_OTHER (with default priority)
scheduling policy: SCHED_OTHER
scheduling parameter priority: 0 (min=0, max=0)
cpu affinity: 3
after 10000 iterations:
    min=54001 cycles (1000.019 us, 1.000 ms)
    avg=54002.001 cycles (1000.037 us, 1.000 ms)
    max=54004 cycles (1000.074 us, 1.000 ms)
OK: worst latency < 2 ms

Thank you Christophe and Clark!


--
Sebastian Kuzminsky



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux