On 2022-06-26 08:30:19 [-0400], Joe Korty wrote: > Hi Mark, > Absent an actual test of your port of a99e09659e6c to 4.9-rt, I just > eye-verified that the change it makes to sigqueue_free_current looks > correct. In detail, > > matches the same change the Linus patch makes to __sigqueue_free (ie, > to the routine that sigqueue_free_current is a copy of). > > That the new variable 'up', in sigqueue_free_current, is being used > in the patch (some variants of this fix do not have 'up'), and that > variable is present in 4.9's version of sigqueue_free_current. > > That atomic_dec_and_test, rather than the refcounting version of that > some function, is being used (some versions of this patch are refcounted > instead). What is the status here? Is this still needed? > Regards, > Joe Sebastian
