On 2022-08-03 11:17:22 [+0200], David Oberhollenzer wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
Hi David,
> this patch set is based on the one Richard submitted in late
> June, but was asked to use the changes from v5.17 instead
> of v5.16. I was under the impression that this meant to use
> the state of the code in v5.17 instead, as some of the back
> ported code was refactored a bit further upstream.
You refer to
https://lore.kernel.org/all/1958751921.205825.1655985764383.JavaMail.zimbra@xxxxxx/T/#u
> I tried to stick to Richards patch set, picking the equivalent
> changes in mm from the git history, leading up to the v5.17.1-rt17
> tag in linux-rt-devel. So, except for the changes to make it work
> on v5.15.49-rt47 in linux-stable-rt, those patches should represent
> what ended up in 5.17.1-rt17, right?
I pointed out the patches from the queue that ended upstream.
After upstream's review a few things changed like the revert of the
user/irq context and so on. For simplicity reasons I would prefer to
stick with one solution and not add the intermediate patches, that I had
in the queue before I was able to settle with upstream on something, to
release that is maintained for a longer period. So any problems that pop
in 5.15 should be same as in later releases.
The patches I mentioned ended up in v5.18 and were part of the latest
v5.17-RT releases including v5.17.1-rt17, yes.
> Greetings,
>
> David
Sebastian
