I'm currently working through some conflicts when I merged Greg's v5.15.58 into the 5.15-rt stable tree, but I'd be very interesting in testing in your patch after I get that resolved. Clark On Mon, Aug 1, 2022 at 10:36 PM Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 8/1/22 14:17, Joseph Salisbury wrote: > > > > > > On 7/29/22 12:14, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > >> On 2022-07-27 16:35:44 [-0400], Joseph Salisbury wrote: > >>> Hi David, > >> Hi, > >> > >>> Do you know if these patches will be merged into the 5.15 patchset? > >> I'm going to look at these next week. Has this been tested? > > If anyone is interested in testing these patches with the Ubuntu > > distro, I created a 5.15.39 based test kernel which is packaged as a > > .deb. This test kernel has the rt-42 patch set, and the four patches > > from David. > > This test kernel can be downloaded from: > > https://people.canonical.com/~jsalisbury/MEMCG_UNSUPPORTED_TEST_KERNEL/ > Also, the test kernel is AMD64. If anyone needs an ARM64 kernel, just > let me know. > > > > This kernel will also be tested in an Ubuntu kernel bug[0]. The bug > > reporter will be testing if the patches resolve a bug that affects > > kubernetes, which is missing cgroup memory. However, the bug reporter > > will probably not be testing latency differences. That is something I > > could look into next week. > > > > Joe > > > > [0] http://pad.lv/1978814 > >> > >>> Thanks, > >>> > >>> Joe > >> Sebastian > > >
