On 2022-03-28 07:39:25 [-1000], Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Hi, > I wonder whether it'd be useful to provide a set of wrappers which can make > switching between workqueue and kworker easy. Semantics-wise, they're > already mostly aligned and it shouldn't be too difficult to e.g. make an > unbounded workqueue be backed by a dedicated kthread_worker instead of > shared pool depending on a flag, or even allow switching dynamically. This could work. For the tty layer it could use 'lowlatency' attribute to decide which implementation makes sense. > Thanks. > Sebastian
