On Mon, 21 Mar 2022 09:36:11 +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
>Did you import 587C5ECA5D0A306C.asc from korg?
Hi,
no, I imported it from a keyserver.
>I have very strong feelings when it comes to gpg and no they are not
>the good ones.
;)
I suspected a subkey, but OTOH it's odd that a check points to a
missing subkey, without mentioning the key that needs to be imported.
It's also odd that the needed key is available by a keyserver, but
without the subkey included.
Thank you, I imported from git and all is good now [1].
Regards,
Ralf
[1]
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ gpg --import /tmp/pgpkeys/keys/587C5ECA5D0A306C.asc
gpg: key 587C5ECA5D0A306C: 17 signatures not checked due to missing keys
gpg: key 587C5ECA5D0A306C: "Daniel Wagner <wagi@xxxxxxxxx>" 24 new signatures
gpg: key 587C5ECA5D0A306C: "Daniel Wagner <wagi@xxxxxxxxx>" 2 new subkeys
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg: new subkeys: 2
gpg: new signatures: 24
[snip]
[rocketmouse@archlinux linux-rt]$ makepkg -s
==> Making package: linux-rt 4.19.235_rt106-0.1000 (Mon 21 Mar 2022 10:58:09 CET)
[snip]
==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg...
linux-4.19.235.tar ... Passed
patch-4.19.235-rt106.patch ... Passed
[snip]
