Re: [PATCH v2] rt-numa: ignore runtime cpumask if -a CPULIST is specified

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2022-01-28 12:44:14 [-0500], John Kacur wrote:
> I agree that our current method is too restrictive, so I like the basic 
> idea here.
> 
> I think we also need to differentiate between -a with no arguments
> and -a all. -a with no arguments should inherit the cpumask from the 
> runtime environment but -a all, should be the same as specifying all the 
> cpus and ignoring the inherited cpumask.

do you consider number of online CPUs to not deploy more threads than
CPUs online in case some were shutdown?

> Thanks
> 
> John

Sebastian



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux