Re: [PATCH] rt-numa: Correct the comment of numa_initialize()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Based on that, neither 0 nor 1 is defined.

Yes, it is.

But I think the comment is to describe the return value of numa_initialize()
not for numa_available().

That is also the reason why it has 0 and 1 as its return values.

Oscar



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux