Re: [PATCH] rt-numa: Fix the value to check in numa_initialize()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rt-numa: Fix the value to check in numa_initialize()
From: 向景亘 <oscar0225@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2021 06:29:40 +0000
Accept-language: zh-TW, en-US
Cc: "linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-rt-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Clark Williams <williams@xxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <edf1dff-ec8-c42b-d1c-8fba1b96d36d@redhat.com>
References: <TYCP286MB1913E08DE65A54E19F3286F3A17D9@TYCP286MB1913.JPNP286.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <edf1dff-ec8-c42b-d1c-8fba1b96d36d@redhat.com>


> On Dec 22, 2021, at 11:45 PM, John Kacur <jkacur@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> No, it looks to me like the code is correct but the comment is incorrect.
> If you submit a patch fixing the comment, I'll apply it.
> 

I agree. I will send another patch to fix the comment.

Thanks

Oscar

References:
- [PATCH] rt-numa: Fix the value to check in numa_initialize()
  - From: Oscar Shiang
- Re: [PATCH] rt-numa: Fix the value to check in numa_initialize()
  - From: John Kacur

Prev by Date: Re: [RT] BUG in sched/cpupri.c
Next by Date: Re: [RT] BUG in sched/cpupri.c
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] rt-numa: Fix the value to check in numa_initialize()
Next by thread: [PATCH] rt-numa: Correct the comment of numa_initialize()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [RT Stable] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Video 4 Linux] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux