On 2021-11-23 10:37:55 [-0500], Steven Rostedt wrote: > Is there something else missing here, as this gives the following rejects in > irq_work.c: Yeah, there is this irq-work in v5.10-RT and this slightly different thing that managed upstream while upstream managed to alter their code, too :) Please find attached as a reply to this email the backported patches: [PATCH RT 1/3] irq_work: Allow irq_work_sync() to sleep if irq_work() no [PATCH RT 2/3] irq_work: Handle some irq_work in a per-CPU thread on [PATCH RT 3/3] irq_work: Also rcuwait for !IRQ_WORK_HARD_IRQ on which apply here on top of v5.10.78-rt55. Sebastian
