Re: [RFC RT v5.10] [rt] repair usage of dev_base_lock in netstat_show()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2021-10-11 15:56:09 [+0200], To Luis Claudio R. Goncalves wrote:
> So my guess is that the _bh isn't needed.

Correction: If there is at least _one_ reader in softirq all, writer
need to disable BH which _might_ be the case here.
The splat is probably because on read_lock holder disables BH later on
which I don't see yet.

Sebastian



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux