Re: Strange problem with PREEMPT_RT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 30 Sep 2021, John Ogness wrote:

> On 2021-09-30, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> With hackbench, the system is sufficiently busy to avoid the going
> >> into idle.
> >
> > Not just that. cyclictest's usage of /dev/cpu_dma_latency has the side
> > effect that it may disable some of the PM stuff in the system.
> > So your system appears good but then when cyclictest is gone, the
> > numbers go up.
> >
> > Maybe we should drop that so we observe a system without altering its
> > behaviour?
> 
> +1
> 
> Developers wanting to explicitly cause this behavior can use --latency=
> to enable it. Having it on as a default is misleading.
> 
> John Ogness
> 

If you pass "--laptop" to cyclictest then it won't use the trick of 
writing to /dev/cpu_dma_latency in order to save battery power.
It doesn't matter whether you are really running on a laptop or not.

John Kacur




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux