On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 11:41:22AM +0200, nsaenzju@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > How about 'counter_[m]hz'? If not I'm fine with 'clock_[m]hz'. 'counter_[m]hz' looks good to me too. Thanks. -- Peter Xu
On Thu, Sep 09, 2021 at 11:41:22AM +0200, nsaenzju@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > How about 'counter_[m]hz'? If not I'm fine with 'clock_[m]hz'. 'counter_[m]hz' looks good to me too. Thanks. -- Peter Xu