On 2021-08-19 11:20:35 [-0700], Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > This piece above, I don't understand. I had it running for a while and > > it didn't explode. Let me try TREE01 for 30min without that piece. > > This might be historical. There was a time when interrupts being > disabled across rcu_read_unlock() meant that preemption had to have > been disabled across the entire RCU read-side critical section. > > I am not seeing a purpose for it now, but I could easily be missing > something, especially given my tenuous grasp of RT. Okay. So the 30min test didn't trigger any warnings… > Either way, looking forward to the next version! Good. So if you liked what you have seen then I'm going to resubmit the above as a proper patch then. Thanks! > Thanx, Paul Sebastian
