Re: [rfc/patch] mm/slub: restore/expand unfreeze_partials() local exclusion scope

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2021-07-24 at 00:39 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
>
> If not, then I would expect this to work (I don't think they ever nest
> in the opposite order, also lockdep should tell us instead of
> -ENOBOOT?), but might be missing something...

Yeah, like #ifndef CONFIG_PREMPT_RT at the bottom of the loop that our
useless damn eyeballs auto-correct instead of reporting :)

	-Mike





[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux