On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 03:27:31PM -0400, John Kacur wrote: > I suppose this is a fair question, although another question would be > is it useful in the rt-tests suites for other reasons? > It could be used as the "engine" of a test that would be similar to > pi_stress, with a different kind of mechanism. If there is clear indication which code is provided as coding example and which is a RT test it would already help. I was under the impression pi_stress tries to test RT behavior. Maybe moving pi_stress to 'examples' would already be enough. > So then the question would be, is there a value in another pi_stress > like test that avoids pthreads? > > If so, I could work it up into a test. I suppose having more RT tests is good thing. IIRC there are more RT tests available, e.g. in LTP. So not sure if this is not already covered somewhere else.
