Re: big rt latencies compared to non rt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Angelo,

On 2021-05-11, Angelo Dureghello <angelo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> cyclictest --duration=180 -t=1 -m -Sp99 \
>          -i2000 -h3000 -q > histogram
>
> Average is near 16uS but there are some outside
> values near 40000, as

The first column is the latency in microseconds. The other columns
(2nd-5th) is the count of times that latency was seen for a CPU.

> 000009 000000    000000    000000    000000
> 000010 000001    000000    000002    000000
> 000011 000002    000000    000000    000000
> 000012 000023    000006    000008    000004
> 000013 001565    001504    002010    001367
> 000014 000425    001959    000649    000700
> 000015 001447    001917    001129    001415
> 000016 034084    026118    040328    032334
> 000017 040537    015000    033773    041092  <-----

CPU3 saw a latency of 17us 41092 times.

John Ogness




[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux