Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] cyclictest: Move main pid setaffinity handling into a function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 25 Mar 2021, Jonathan Schwender wrote:

> Move error handling for setting the affinity of the main pid
> into a separate function.
> This prevents duplicating the code in the next commit,
> where the main thread pid can be restricted to one of
> two bitmasks depending on the passed parameters.
> 
> After feedback from John Kacur, the function is now
> located in src/lib/rt-numa.c.
> This allows other tests to reuse this, if they also
> prefer to warn if numa_sched_setaffinity fails.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Schwender <schwenderjonathan@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c |  8 +-------
>  src/include/rt-numa.h       |  2 ++
>  src/lib/rt-numa.c           | 11 +++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c b/src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c
> index dca9610..460f6ae 100644
> --- a/src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c
> +++ b/src/cyclictest/cyclictest.c
> @@ -1791,13 +1791,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  
>  	/* Restrict the main pid to the affinity specified by the user */
>  	if (affinity_mask != NULL) {
> -		int res;
> -
> -		errno = 0;
> -		res = numa_sched_setaffinity(getpid(), affinity_mask);
> -		if (res != 0)
> -			warn("Couldn't setaffinity in main thread: %s\n", strerror(errno));
> -
> +		try_numa_sched_setaffinity(getpid(), affinity_mask);
>  		if (verbose)
>  			printf("Using %u cpus.\n",
>  				numa_bitmask_weight(affinity_mask));
> diff --git a/src/include/rt-numa.h b/src/include/rt-numa.h
> index ca86a45..e9fa312 100644
> --- a/src/include/rt-numa.h
> +++ b/src/include/rt-numa.h
> @@ -18,4 +18,6 @@ int cpu_for_thread_ua(int thread_num, int max_cpus);
>  
>  int parse_cpumask(char *str, int max_cpus, struct bitmask **cpumask);
>  
> +void try_numa_sched_setaffinity(__pid_t pid, struct bitmask *cpumask);
> +
>  #endif
> diff --git a/src/lib/rt-numa.c b/src/lib/rt-numa.c
> index babcc63..9a81cfb 100644
> --- a/src/lib/rt-numa.c
> +++ b/src/lib/rt-numa.c
> @@ -138,3 +138,14 @@ int parse_cpumask(char *str, int max_cpus, struct bitmask **cpumask)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +void try_numa_sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, struct bitmask *cpumask)
> +{
> +	int res;
> +
> +	errno = 0;
> +	res = numa_sched_setaffinity(pid, cpumask);
> +	if (res != 0)
> +		warn("Couldn't setaffinity for thread %d: %s\n", pid,
> +		     strerror(errno));
> +}
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
> 

Yuck. My bad, this is some pretty inelegant error code wrapped around a 
numa call, I don't think it really warrents trying to make an API out of 
it. That said, I might need to do this anyway, when I put back code that 
can run when numa is not available on a target machine.

For now, can you just leave this inline and respin?

Thanks

John Kacur



[Index of Archives]     [RT Stable]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux